Season 2 of Landman feels more polished, moving away from the half-baked ideas of its debut. While still wildly entertaining, the show’s frequent leaps in logic often strain the suspension of disbelief, pulling viewers out of its otherwise gripping narrative.
Landman Season 2 Critique
Doing a job poorly isn’t edgy; it’s embarrassing. Landman Season 2 frustrates viewers more than it bores them, driving disengagement. Unlike Yellowstone, where flawed characters still exude competence, Landman traps its cast in a cycle of professional blunders.
Oil executives fumble basic land deals, while bartenders inexplicably spark brawls, littering the narrative with illogical choices that shatter immersion. Viewers aren’t hating; they’re hopeful, craving competence that never arrives, yearning for depth and realism. For Landman to truly shine in Season 2, it must respect its characters and audience, crafting believable jobs and resonant decisions that anchor the story in authenticity.
Landman Season 2 Critique
Landman Season 2 has a character problem that Yellowstone never did. In Yellowstone, characters like Rip, John, and Beth are morally gray but undeniably competent, executing tasks with ruthless precision, even if brutal. In contrast, Landman asks us to root for oil execs, workers, and consultants who are consistently out of their depth, misinformed, or dangerously reckless, undermining the show’s credibility.
Scrolling through fan reactions on X, Landman feels like an anatomy of dysfunction. Rebecca (Kayla Wallace), the lawyer, loses arguments to a kid with zero legal education, exposing her incompetence. Monty (Jon Hamm) promotes people whose skills don’t match their roles, creating chaos in high-stakes oil deals. Nursing home employees inexplicably trust random women with serving alcohol and leading field trips, defying logic. A bartender bickers with customers instead of working efficiently, further eroding professionalism. It’s as if every character wears a professional badge but lacks the knowledge or judgment to back it up. The result? A show about professionals where none behave like professionals, leaving viewers frustrated and disconnected from the narrative.
For Landman to rival Yellowstone’s grip, it must craft characters with believable expertise and decisions that resonate, grounding the drama in authenticity rather than contrived incompetence.
Let’s read a few fan comments:
Beyond poor job execution, Landman Season 2 leans on contrived subplots that beg for logic. A 401(k) discussion, as one fan on X noted, feels like an abrupt, misplaced commercial, baffling viewers and writers alike. Similarly, the hazing scene where a kid is injured for a prank isn’t edgy or believable—it’s reckless, unsafe, and reeks of unprofessionalism. Characters don’t just make poor decisions; they make utterly implausible ones, eroding the show’s credibility. These narrative misfires shatter the trust viewers place in the show’s internal logic, leaving them disconnected.
Where Yellowstone lionized its characters, flaws and all, Landman leaves you questioning how these individuals still hold jobs. The storytelling falters as it tries to glorify characters whose actions starkly contradict their reputations, undermining the drama’s impact. Unlike Yellowstone’s grounded competence, Landman’s cast stumbles through illogical choices, failing to earn viewer investment. For the series to resonate, it must craft coherent subplots and characters with believable expertise, anchoring the narrative in authenticity rather than contrived chaos.
Taylor Sheridan’s Landman: Popularity Trends Ahead of Season 2
Taylor Sheridan, the crowned king of modern Western melodrama, crafts sprawling tales, but even monarchs stumble. Despite Landman’s potent premise—the volatile oil industry—and a commanding lead in Billy Bob Thornton, the series sees its early wildfire momentum fizzle out like a West Texas puddle under an August sun.
Beyond poor job execution, Landman Season 2 leans on contrived subplots that beg for logic. A 401(k) discussion, as one fan on X noted, feels like an abrupt, misplaced commercial, baffling viewers and writers alike. Similarly, the hazing scene where a kid is injured for a prank isn’t edgy or believable—it’s reckless, unsafe, and reeks of unprofessionalism. Characters don’t just make poor decisions; they make utterly implausible ones, eroding the show’s credibility. These narrative misfires shatter the trust viewers place in the show’s internal logic, leaving them disconnected.
Where Yellowstone lionized its characters, flaws and all, Landman leaves you questioning how these individuals still hold jobs. The storytelling falters as it tries to glorify characters whose actions starkly contradict their reputations, undermining the drama’s impact. Unlike Yellowstone’s grounded competence, Landman’s cast stumbles through illogical choices, failing to earn viewer investment. For the series to resonate, it must craft coherent subplots and characters with believable expertise, anchoring the narrative in authenticity rather than contrived chaos.
Taylor Sheridan’s signature grit defines his work, but in Landman, that formula risks hardening into a predictable rut. While Yellowstone often buckled under its own baroque masculinity, it wove a compelling mythos that kept viewers hooked. Landman, however, feels like a sterile PowerPoint on fracking, sprinkled with cowboy boots for flair. According to FlixPatrol (via Collider), it’s slumped to #17 on Paramount+ in the U.S., a stark fall from its swaggering debut akin to Yellowstone’s kin. With Season 2 in production, this slide casts a troubling shadow.
Sheridan assembled a stellar ensemble: Ali Larter as an exasperated Greek chorus, Demi Moore magnetic as Tommy’s ex-wife, Michelle Randolph injecting Gen Z chaos, and Jon Hamm, whose commanding presence outshone all—only to be shockingly killed off. The pieces were in place, yet the execution falters.
Streaming chart placement reveals a deeper truth: narrative urgency. Shows don’t slip because they’re bad; they slip when viewers stop craving the next twist. Beyond poor job execution, Landman Season 2 leans on contrived subplots that beg for logic. A 401(k) discussion, as one fan on X noted, feels like an abrupt, misplaced commercial, baffling viewers and writers alike. Similarly, the hazing scene where a kid is injured for a prank isn’t edgy or believable—it’s reckless, unsafe, and reeks of unprofessionalism. Characters don’t just make poor decisions; they make utterly implausible ones, eroding the show’s credibility. These narrative misfires shatter the trust viewers place in the show’s internal logic, leaving them disconnected.
Where Yellowstone lionized its characters, flaws and all, Landman leaves you questioning how these individuals still hold jobs. The storytelling falters as it tries to glorify characters whose actions starkly contradict their reputations, undermining the drama’s impact. Unlike Yellowstone’s grounded competence, Landman’s cast stumbles through illogical choices, failing to earn viewer investment. If Season 2 wants to matter, it must grow up, crafting coherent subplots and characters with believable expertise to anchor the narrative in authenticity. Right now, Landman doesn’t feel like a story being told—it feels like a brand being propped up.
Also Read: Y: Marshals Episode 1 Trailer: New Yellowstone Sequel